Build Canada LogoBuilder MP
← Back to bills

Guarantee Repairs and Longer-Lasting Electronics

An Act to establish a national framework to promote the durability of electronic products and essential home appliances

Summary

This bill directs the Minister of Industry to create a national framework to improve the durability and repairability of electronic products and essential home appliances sold in Canada. The framework must set measures and national standards for minimum useful life, transparency and labeling, accessible parts/tools/technical documentation, availability of replacements, and software support. It requires consultations with provinces and consumer advocates, and consideration of legislative obligations, inspections, and penalties to ensure compliance. The Minister must table a report within 18 months, publish it, and conduct a five-year review of implementation and effectiveness.

  • Develop national standards on minimum useful life, repairability, labeling, and software support.
  • Require reasonably accessible parts, tools, and information for maintenance and repair.
  • Set timeframes for availability of replacement parts and technical documentation.
  • Define responsibilities for manufacturers, importers, distributors, and sellers.
  • Mandate reporting to Parliament, public publication, and a five-year review.
  • Consult provinces and consider enforcement mechanisms and penalties.

Builder Assessment

Vote Yes

Overall, the bill advances consumer welfare and competition by enabling repairability, transparency, and longer product lifespans, which can cut costs and support productivity. Risks of added compliance burden and jurisdictional overlap remain; success hinges on outcome-based, harmonized, low-friction implementation that preserves safety and cybersecurity.

  • Harmonize with EU/US regimes to avoid trade friction and duplicate testing, certification, and labeling.
  • Use performance/outcome-based standards (not prescriptive design rules), provide SME safe harbours, and adopt a single national label with digital-by-default disclosures.
  • Leverage existing federal/provincial enforcement (e.g., Canada Consumer Product Safety Act) to avoid creating duplicative inspectorates; use MOUs and data-sharing.
  • Publish a cost-benefit analysis, cap reporting frequency, and release open data on failure/repair rates to spur competition and innovation.
  • Require a clear minimum duration for software and security updates while enabling independent repair without compromising electrical safety, privacy, or cybersecurity.

Question Period Cards

Will the minister commit that any national standards will be harmonized with U.S. and EU right-to-repair and ecodesign rules, and table a full cost-benefit analysis showing impacts on consumer prices, small manufacturers, and independent repair shops before finalizing the framework?

How will the framework avoid overlap with provincial consumer-protection regimes and prevent duplicate inspections and labels, and will the government create a single national portal and enforcement MOUs with provinces to keep compliance simple and low-cost?

Will the framework set a clear minimum period for software and security updates for connected appliances and prohibit practices like parts-pairing or geofencing that block legitimate independent repair while safeguarding safety and cybersecurity?

Principles Analysis

Canada should aim to be the world's most prosperous country.

Lower replacement costs and clearer information can raise real household incomes and strengthen a competitive consumer market, supporting long-run prosperity.

Promote economic freedom, ambition, and breaking from bureaucratic inertia (reduce red tape).

It opens repair markets and consumer choice, but also contemplates new obligations, inspections, and penalties; the net effect on red tape depends on design and harmonization.

Drive national productivity and global competitiveness.

Longer product lifecycles and easier maintenance reduce downtime and total cost of ownership; uniform standards can bolster competitiveness if interoperable with EU/US rules.

Grow exports of Canadian products and resources.

Export effects are indirect; potential gains hinge on aligning Canadian products with global durability expectations, but the bill does not directly target exports.

Encourage investment, innovation, and resource development.

Incentivizes innovation in durable, modular design and fuels investment in repair/refurbishment ecosystems, though compliance costs must be kept low to avoid deterring entrants.

Deliver better public services at lower cost (government efficiency).

Creates a new federal framework with reporting and potential inspection regimes, risking added administrative overhead and jurisdictional overlap unless tightly streamlined.

Reform taxes to incentivize work, risk-taking, and innovation.

No tax measures are included.

Focus on large-scale prosperity, not incrementalism.

Applies broadly but is a targeted regulatory approach; the overall macroeconomic lift is uncertain and contingent on execution quality.

Did we get the builder vote wrong?

Email hi@buildcanada.com

PartyMember of Parliament
StatusOutside the Order of Precedence
Last updatedN/A
TopicsClimate and Environment, Technology and Innovation, Trade and Commerce, Economics, Labor and Employment
Parliament45