Build Canada LogoBuilder MP
← Back to bills

Fixing Mobile Dead Zones and Coverage Maps

An Act respecting the Spectrum Policy Framework for Canada

Summary

  • Requires the CRTC, within six months, to set up a process to verify the accuracy of carriers’ mobile coverage data, including served areas and deployment requirements.
  • Directs the Minister of Industry to complete a comprehensive review of the 2007 Spectrum Policy Framework within 18 months, consulting carriers, rural and Indigenous representatives, public safety agencies, experts, and the CRTC.
  • Mandates a public report that assesses rural/remote and numbered-road connectivity and public safety, evaluates competition and unused spectrum licensing, incorporates verified coverage data, and proposes Framework changes.
  • Requires ongoing five-year reports on the Framework’s implementation and effectiveness, with tabling in Parliament and publication online.

Builder Assessment

Vote Yes

This bill modernizes a core market framework and mandates accurate coverage data, supporting connectivity, productivity, and investment while improving public safety along critical corridors. Although it introduces oversight processes, its emphasis on competition, efficient spectrum use, and verified information positions Canada for stronger economic performance.

  • Positives: Verified coverage maps, an overdue framework refresh, priority for rural/remote and Indigenous connectivity, attention to competition and unused spectrum, and transparency through public reporting that supports safety and economic activity.
  • Risks: Additional administrative burden without defined enforcement tools could blunt impact; lack of firm coverage targets or penalties may delay rural outcomes.
  • Builders would strengthen it by setting clear deadlines and outcome-based coverage obligations, defining clawbacks for unused spectrum and consequences for inaccurate maps, publishing open geospatial coverage data, streamlining auctions and licensing to speed builds, and integrating public-safety requirements for numbered roads and first responders.

Question Period Cards

When will the CRTC publish a standardized, independently verified national mobile coverage map under this bill, and what penalties will carriers face for inaccurate submissions?

Will the minister commit, in the Framework update, to firm timelines and automatic clawbacks or reallocation of unused spectrum licences to accelerate rural, remote, Indigenous, and numbered-road coverage critical to public safety?

What specific service-quality metrics and deployment requirements will the updated Framework include, and how will the department resource this work to avoid delaying spectrum auctions or network builds?

Principles Analysis

Canada should aim to be the world's most prosperous country.

Modernizing spectrum policy and ensuring accurate coverage data enables broader connectivity that underpins economic activity and safety across regions, including rural and remote communities.

Promote economic freedom, ambition, and breaking from bureaucratic inertia (reduce red tape).

The bill confronts policy inertia by forcing an overdue framework update, but it also adds verification and reporting obligations; the net effect on red tape is unclear.

Drive national productivity and global competitiveness.

Reliable mobile coverage and better spectrum utilization support digital adoption, remote work, advanced manufacturing, and safety along trade corridors, lifting productivity and competitiveness.

Grow exports of Canadian products and resources.

Connectivity upgrades can indirectly aid exporters and digital services, but the bill does not directly target export growth.

Encourage investment, innovation, and resource development.

A refreshed framework, consideration of licensing unused spectrum, and verified data clarity can spur telecom investment and deployment of innovative networks (e.g., 5G/6G).

Deliver better public services at lower cost (government efficiency).

Accurate maps can target subsidies and emergency coverage more efficiently, but new processes may add administrative cost; overall efficiency impact is uncertain.

Reform taxes to incentivize work, risk-taking, and innovation.

No tax measures are included.

Focus on large-scale prosperity, not incrementalism.

A national framework review is systemic and important, but concrete, large-scale deployment outcomes depend on subsequent implementation decisions.

Did we get the builder vote wrong?

Email hi@buildcanada.com

PartyMember of Parliament
StatusOutside the Order of Precedence
Last updatedN/A
TopicsTechnology and Innovation, Infrastructure, Indigenous Affairs
Parliament45