Vote Yes
An Act respecting national action for the prevention of intimate partner violence
The bill advances safety and accountability by requiring coordinated national action and transparent reporting on intimate partner violence. While it introduces some process obligations, the potential to reduce duplication and improve service targeting justifies support.
What measurable outcomes, timelines, and an administrative overhead cap will the Minister include so that the first biennial report shows dollars moving from meetings and reports to frontline IPV supports and results?
How will the government avoid duplicating provincial strategies and create formal data-sharing agreements that respect privacy while reducing fragmentation and wait times for victims seeking help?
Why wait up to a year to begin engagements, and will the Minister commit to an accelerated timeline with standardized national indicators and public quarterly progress dashboards?
Focuses on public safety and coordination rather than direct economic growth; any prosperity gains are indirect through reduced social and health costs.
Introduces mandated engagements and biennial reporting without explicit streamlining, potentially adding administrative layers.
Improved safety could modestly support workforce stability, but the bill contains no direct productivity measures.
No trade or export provisions.
No provisions related to investment incentives or innovation policy.
Creates regular coordination and public reporting that can surface duplication, improve targeting, and enhance accountability for outcomes and costs.
No tax measures.
Narrow, process-focused safety initiative; important socially but not an economic transformation.
Did we get the builder vote wrong?
Email hi@buildcanada.com